Date: 2017-06-10 07:16 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] mabus
This isn't a direct response, but some thoughts on the subject.

Christianity's moral and ethical parameters are initially delivered to the poorer memmbers of a powerless conquered people on the edge of a great empire. But the religion spread until the Emperor himself espoused it. Nothing explicitly said what to do about rebellious provinces or hostile border powers or his duties to his subjects. The religious authorities hashed something out in response to the new challenges. Some of it worked. Some of it didn't. Some of what worked, we now believe was horrifically immoral anyway.

Christianity, in short, has a persistent problem when it comes to how the powerful should act. Effective responses, and responses we at least intuitively expect to be effective, are frequently considered immoral.

How do we adequately judge how an omnipotent being should behave? I don't say this merely to justify, but to actively raise the question. How much evil are we allowed to do that good may come?
From:
Anonymous
OpenID
Identity URL: 
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

Profile

wingedbeast

October 2017

S M T W T F S
1 23 45 67
8 910 1112 1314
151617 1819 2021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 22nd, 2017 11:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios